# integration of inspxe-cl

**URL:** <https://discourse.cmake.org/t/integration-of-inspxe-cl/3404>\
**Category:** Code\
**Created:** [May 25, 2021, 2:37pm UTC](https://discourse.cmake.org/t/integration-of-inspxe-cl/3404 "2021-05-25T14:37:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grimgort](https://discourse.cmake.org/user_avatar/discourse.cmake.org/grimgort/32/1002_2.png) [@grimgort](https://discourse.cmake.org/u/grimgort)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2021, 2:37pm UTC](https://discourse.cmake.org/t/integration-of-inspxe-cl/3404/1 "2021-05-25T14:37:09Z")

</div>

Hello,

I wanted to know if it was possible to integrate the intel suite in the code analysis? For example, use inspxe-cl to do memory leak analysis instead of valgrind. Same for the gcov equivalent  
Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ben.boeckel](https://discourse.cmake.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/ea5d25/32.png) [@ben.boeckel](https://discourse.cmake.org/u/ben.boeckel)\
**Post date:** [May 25, 2021, 4:55pm UTC](https://discourse.cmake.org/t/integration-of-inspxe-cl/3404/2 "2021-05-25T16:55:30Z")

</div>

This sounds like [a new feature request](https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues). I think CTest would at least need to learn how to extract the report from the output.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grimgort](https://discourse.cmake.org/user_avatar/discourse.cmake.org/grimgort/32/1002_2.png) [@grimgort](https://discourse.cmake.org/u/grimgort)\
**Post date:** [May 27, 2021, 3:28pm UTC](https://discourse.cmake.org/t/integration-of-inspxe-cl/3404/3 "2021-05-27T15:28:47Z")

</div>

Thanks.  
see: [https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/22253](https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/22253)